Ill-Fitting Suit 2


Troll - The Out Of My Mind BlogThe trolls are back in town. Not the ugly-but-somehow-cuddly Disney trolls that break into song at the drop of a music cue. The only thing these trolls break into is your wallet.

And they’re at right now.

“Patent trolls cost the American economy tens of billions of dollars a year,” according to Lee Cheng, the Chief Legal Officer of Newegg.com, the multi-billion dollar online retailer.

In deep, dark woods, that look strangely like bars in upscale hotels, these trolls buy improperly issued patents and patents that were never used to build products. Thanks to loopholes in patent law, those patents are all the trolls need to extort money from businesses.

“One troll claimed it held the patent on scanners,” Cheng told me, “and they would threaten small businesses with legal action that would run into millions, if not tens of millions, of dollars. But they’d settle for $1000 for each employee using a scanner.”

Like Disney, patent trolls appreciate the importance of a happy ending…even if they differ on the details.

The payments these companies make, often called the toll of the troll, show up in the increased prices we pay for technology products—and then again in lost jobs and lost economic potential.

When companies refuse to deal, the trolls toss happiness under the bus. “Trolls take these completely useless patents and use them to file lawsuits against companies that are offering real products and services,” Cheng said.

These suits are calamities on a cartoon scale. They can cost between one- and six-million dollars to defend, with no guarantee of a successful outcome.

That might make for a good courtroom thriller, if these cases were played out on the screen with fake movie cash. Instead the dollars are real and the location is the United States District Court in the Eastern District of Texas, a slice of the state often recognized as a westernmost extension of the Deep South.

It’s also a venue that bends over backward to favor plaintiffs in patent lawsuits.

It’s in East Texas that the trolls invoke their powerful magic with the incantation U-S-P-T-O…U-S-P-T-O.

Patents, the legal right to exploit ownership of an invention, are issued by the USPTO, the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
Faced with an increasing flood of applications, and a cultural bias toward approving patents as an indicator of America’s innovative strength, there’s an increasing flood of patents coming out of the USPTO that should never have made it past the Beltway.

Cheng concluded that capitulating to these trolls’ demands would result in a weakened tech economy and he convinced other Newegg executives the company needed to take a stand.

He began scrawling “Sue Us” on trolls’ lawsuits. The trolls were happy to oblige. And, one by one, they lost their suits.

In one case, their Armani suits.

“We were sued by Sovereign Software, a troll claiming it owned patents covering online shopping carts,” Cheng said.

A patent on an online shopping cart? There’s a fantasy even Disney couldn’t dream up. Of course, it’s not as creative as the troll that claimed the rights to the search box.

(Yes, seriously. A patent on the search box.)

But, as a popular screenwriting guru once insisted, there are 32,767 plots in the world. It seems only fair to give the trolls two of them.

“Newegg was successful not because of the shopping cart,” Cheng continued, “yet Sovereign claimed that, years after Newegg was launched, we owed them one percent of our revenue, because we couldn’t have succeeded without them.”

In true Disney fashion, Newegg lost at trial, leaving Cheng battered, bruised, and defeated. Until he appealed the verdict.

“The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals invalidated all of Sovereign’s patents,” he said.

That twist was not in Sovereign’s copy of the script.

“Sovereign tried to save themselves by appealing to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court told them too bad. Your patents are invalid,” Cheng said.

Aside from taking Newegg off the legal hook, the ruling neutered Sovereign’s business. The patents that were worthless in products were worthless in court as well.

Today, trolls give Newegg a wide berth when picking their lawsuit targets.

Unfortunately, far more companies choose to pay the trolls than defend themselves. The payments these companies make, often called the toll of the troll, show up in the increased prices we pay for technology products—and then again in lost jobs and lost economic potential when companies have to scale back their operations to recoup their settlements.

Perhaps that’s why Cheng is adamant about closing the loopholes through which the tolls flow. “People should be, and can be, calling their Congressmen and Senators to urge them to pass meaningful patent reform legislation,” Cheng said.

And why not? It’s a troll-free call.

 

Start your Sunday with a laugh. Read the Sunday Funnies, fresh humor from The Out Of My Mind Blog. Subscribe now and you'll never miss a post.

 

Lee Cheng

Courtesy of Lee Cheng

Lee Cheng is the Chief Legal Officer of Newegg Inc., a $2.8B global Internet retailer. In addition to his Newegg duties, he has been recognized by multiple business, legal, and professional organizations with awards and leadership positions on their boards and committees. In 2009, Cheng was selected as Best Lawyer under 40 by the National Asian Pacific American Bar Association (NAPABA) . He is frequently asked to speak on legal and business topics including achieving successful outcomes in litigation. Cheng received a Bachelor’s degree in History and Science, magna cum laude, from Harvard University and a JD from the University of California, Berkeley, Boalt Hall School of Law.

 

Mind Doodle…

Patent craziness isn’t restricted to high-tech products. In 1999, the USPTO issued a patent for an Interactive Life-Sized Bowl of Soup (US 6168531). Infringe on this patent only if you want to find yourself in hot water.

Photo: maritravel/Pixabay (Rights: Public Domain)

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

2 thoughts on “Ill-Fitting Suit

  • Nick Iuppa

    In the 80s some guy filed a patent on an interactive learning machine and included branching storylines in the patent. The he sued Bank of American where I had designed a story based learning system to teach bank personnel. When I moved to HP and did a similar program, he sued them. Both companies caved. The I moved to Apple, and designed an interactive learning system. The guy sued Apple. Big Mistake on his part. Some companies don’t put up with that kind of crap.

    • Jay Douglas Post author

      HI Nick…

      Thanks for sharing your story.

      I’ve read about patents over the years and can only shake my head on what’s been considered patentable. Especially when it comes to software patents. About the only thing I haven’t seen is someone claiming the rights to 1+1 equaling 2.

      You may know that when Adam Corolla began podcasting he was sued by a patent troll that claimed the rights to podcasting. This despite the fact that the patent was dated after podcasting became somewhat commonplace. The USPTO granted the patent anyway.

      Corolla scraped together the money to fight the troll. He won. Even so, I saw a report late last year that the same troll, or another one, is claiming to own podcasting.

      If we could convert greed into energy we’d never have to import a drop of oil again.

      — jay